BACKED BY Y Combinator COMBINATOR

The AI platform for firmware engineers.

Build, flash, test and debug firmware in a single, AI-powered workflow.

Embedder is an AI coding agent purpose-built for firmware and embedded software engineers. It empowers teams to generate, debug, analyze, and verify code using deep hardware knowledge and closed-loop workflows. Supports 400+ MCUs and 2,000+ peripherals across STM32, ESP32, nRF52/nRF91, NXP, Infineon, Microchip, and RISC-V families. Every generated line is grounded in reference manuals, datasheets, and errata.

Unlike generic AI coding tools, Embedder is grounded in the actual constraints of the target system—register definitions, peripheral behavior, precise timing, and hardware-aware validation. Core capabilities include documentation-grounded generation, integrated debugging and root cause analysis, loop-integrated static analysis, closed-loop hardware validation, project and environment context, and hardware-interactive workflows that integrate live signals from serial output, debugger states, traces, and instrumentation directly into the engineering loop.

Core workflows include specification-first development, accelerated hardware bring-up, peripheral and driver implementation, rapid debugging and root cause analysis, iterative refinement and re-validation, and hybrid simulation and lab validation. Enterprise use cases include legacy codebase modernization, compliance and audit acceleration, cross-platform migrations, rapid prototyping and bring-up, hardware-aware test generation, and high-impact debugging.

Integrates natively with debug probes (J-Link, ST-Link, OpenOCD, GDB), logic analyzers (Saleae, Digilent), power profilers (Nordic PPK, Joulescope), and bench equipment (Siglent, Rigol). Deployment options include Managed SaaS, Customer VPC, and On-Premises and Air-Gapped configurations for organizations that treat firmware, design assets, and hardware documentation as sensitive intellectual property. Piloted by industry leaders across semiconductors, IoT, medical technology, automotive, and aerospace/defense.

Search every datasheet, instantly.

Embedder analyzes your datasheets, reference manuals, schematics, and errata with advanced computer vision.

EMBEDDER
How do I configure USART2 for 9600 …×
+
How do I configure USART2 for 9600 baud on STM32F407?
dispatched 4 subagents in parallel
searched §30.6.3 · Baud rate generation
searched Table 136 · baud error @ fCK = 42 MHz
searched §30.6.6 · USART_BRR register layout
searched §30.3.2 · PCLK1 clock tree
Set USART2->BRR = 0x1117. PCLK1 runs at 42 MHz, so USARTDIV = 42 MHz / (16 × 9 600) ≈ 273.44 → mantissa 273, fraction 7/16. Per Table 136 in RM0090 (§30.6.3), this produces an error of +0.02%.
Try: Explain OVER8 sampling mode
+
Debug
RM0090.pdf
1014/1745
100%
USARTRM0090
30.6.3

Baud rate generation

The baud rate for the receiver and transmitter (Rx and Tx) are both set to the same value as programmed in the Mantissa and Fraction values of USARTDIV.

Tx/Rx baud = fCK / (8 × (2 − OVER8) × USARTDIV)

USARTDIV is an unsigned fixed-point number coded on the USART_BRR register:

  • The 12-bit mantissa of USARTDIV is programmed in the DIV_Mantissa[11:0] bits of USART_BRR.
  • The fraction of USARTDIV is programmed in the DIV_Fraction[3:0] bits. When OVER8 = 1, bit DIV_Fraction[3] must be cleared.
  • After writing a new value in USART_BRR the baud counter is replaced by the new one. The new value therefore takes effect at the next byte transfer.
Table 136. Error calculation for programmed baud rates at fCK = 42 MHz, OVER8 = 0
Baud rate
USARTDIV
BRR (hex)
Error
2 400
1093.75
0x4443
0.00%
9 600
273.437
0x1116
−0.01%
19 200
136.718
0x0888
−0.02%
38 400
68.359
0x0444
+0.03%
57 600
45.572
0x02D9
−0.05%
115 200
22.787
0x016C
+0.04%
230 400
11.393
0x00B6
+0.16%
460 800
5.696
0x005B
−0.39%
921 600
2.848
0x002D
+0.45%
1014/1745DocID018909 Rev 20

Debug with hardware-in-the-loop.

Embedder streams serial output, debugger state, captures and waveforms into the same session as code generation and analysis.

Runtime visibility without leaving the session

Embedder reads serial output and drives GDB sessions, stepping breakpoints, inspecting registers and memory, and correlating runtime state with the code under review. Failures get diagnosed against what the chip actually did, not what the source implied.

SerialST-LINK VCP · STM32F407VG · 115200 8N1
ConnectFilterClearDetect baud
[00.004] [boot] STM32F407VG @ 168 MHz, RAM 192 KB
[00.008] [boot] HAL init ok, SysTick 1 kHz
[00.012] [boot] USART2 up · 115200 8N1
[00.018] [boot] I2C1 400 kHz · scanning bus
[00.041] [i2c] MPU-6050 @ 0x68 present
[00.050] [imu] gyro cal gx=-12 gy=+4 gz=-3
[00.052] [app] entering main loop
[02.110] [imu] s=0423 ax= 128 ay= -64 az=8192
[02.115] [ctrl] pid u=+0.12 err=+0.003
[02.120] [imu] s=0425 ax=32767 ay=32767 az=32767
[02.121] [imu] WARN saturated axis, retry
[02.125] [i2c] NACK @ 0x68 (attempt 3)
[02.131] [halt] target stopped — SIGTRAP (imu.c:192)
PORT/dev/cu.usbmodem2103BAUD115200
Debug Output×
(gdb) target extended-remote :3333
Remote debugging using :3333.
(gdb) break imu.c:192 if buf[0] == 0xff
Breakpoint 2 at 0x08003b10: imu.c, line 192.
(gdb) continue
 
Breakpoint 2, imu_read (out=0x20001f40)
at imu.c:192
192 out->ax = (buf[0]<<8) | buf[1];
(gdb) info registers r0 pc lr
r0 0x20001f40 537001280
pc 0x08003b10 <imu_read+80>
lr 0x08003afd <imu_read+57>
(gdb) p/x buf
$3 = {0xff, 0xff, 0xff, 0xff}
(gdb) bt
#0 imu_read at imu.c:192
#1 control_loop at ctrl.c:84
#2 main at main.c:63
(gdb)
CORECortex-M4PC0x08003b10STATEhalted

Electrical measurements as engineering context

Embedder turns logic analyzer captures and oscilloscope waveforms into structured data. Timing violations, protocol errors, and signal integrity issues surface as reviewable evidence, grounding firmware changes in the electrical behavior of the bus.

100.000 ms150.000 ms200.000 ms250.000 ms300.000 ms
LIN_BUSChannel 0 · 19.2 kbps · digital
ADC_INChannel 1 · 1 kHz · 1.65 V bias

Loved by firmware engineers.

Engineers at hardware companies use Embedder to bring up boards, debug peripherals, and ship firmware faster.

I connected two different devices to the project, and within seconds your agent was able to detect both devices, tell me what they were, find auxiliary files on the web, and update code to change functionality on the PCB. That whole flow worked with basically zero effort on my part.
Engineering Manager, RF Design Firm
Writing drivers for new components used to mean hunting for a ready-made Zephyr RTOS driver first. Now it doesn't matter. I set up a test case that confirms functionality and let Embedder work autonomously. An IMU driver is done in 10 minutes. I can pick any IC on the shelf knowing firmware for it is a 10-minute problem, and it lets us iterate much faster.
CTO, Aerospace & Defense
I've used it for the past week and it's a genuine step up from other AI tools I've tried. The standout feature is how it handles datasheets: the agent references the exact specs from your project's hardware instead of leaning on generalized training data. No hallucinated register names, no invented pin mappings. The result is much more accurate code generation, peripheral configuration, and firmware troubleshooting.
Engineer, Consumer Electronics
As a startup our resources are always spread thin. Embedder writes the driver and the embedded test application in one shot, so we get a close-to-working project on the first few iterations. I pointed it at our semi-complete SDK, told the agent to go learn, and got a VL53L0X driver that passed every test on our custom board. The serial monitor is the cherry on top: the agent reads serial output directly instead of me copy-pasting from my IDE.
Engineer, Edge IoT Semiconductors
I had a data pipeline on the nRF52840 reading sensors at 3.84 kHz, running some processing, and pushing the results over USB. I wanted to verify I wasn't dropping packets and had enough CPU headroom for other tasks. Watching Embedder compile the code, flash it, drive Saleae, and analyze the outputs end-to-end was genuinely powerful, and seamless in a way I haven't seen from other AI tools. Turns out the code kept up with the sensor, which was good to confirm.
Engineer, Medical Devices
As a freelance firmware engineer I work across Microchip, dsPIC, and STM32. I already use Microchip's AI plugin for VSCode. It's helpful for pulling snippets from vectorized datasheets, but not a real game changer. I spent two days full-time trying Embedder on a codec2 port to STM32 HAL, and this actually is one. Very impressed. The next ST project I take on for a customer, I'm using Embedder, no question.
Engineer, Freelance

FAQ

Common questions about platform support and agent behavior.

What hardware platforms does Embedder support?

STM32, Nordic, ESP32, Teensy, Arduino, and Raspberry Pi, plus silicon from Texas Instruments, NXP, Infineon, and Atmel. New vendors added as toolchains mature.

What peripherals does Embedder support?

2,000+ peripherals across the major vendors: Texas Instruments, Analog Devices (including Maxim Integrated), Microchip, STMicroelectronics, NXP, Infineon, and more.

What schematic formats does Embedder support?

Altium, KiCad, Eagle, PADS, and Xpedition.

What test equipment can Embedder drive?

J-Link and OpenOCD for debugging, Saleae and Digilent logic analyzers, Nordic PPK and Joulescope for power profiling, and Siglent and Rigol instruments for scope and supply work.

What actions can Embedder take?

Embedder operates in three modes. It plans, turning your datasheets, schematics, and existing code into a concrete specification. It acts, generating firmware and verifying it against real hardware in the loop. And it debugs, running root-cause analysis against the live board using the integrated test equipment.